Engagement Accelerators
The knowledge graph classifies what kind of engagement activity an organization, attestation, need or commitment concerns with the Phases of Engagement Toolkit's twelve Engagement Accelerators — the SKOS scheme poe:EngagementAcceleratorScheme. The scheme is exactly the Toolkit's twelve domains and nothing else: it carries no narrower concepts, and Global.Church adds none of its own to it. The Toolkit (April 2026; Frontiers, IMB, Joshua Project, Engage Network, Vision 5:9, Accelerate) is the source framework; Global.Church curates the representation.
What an organization is equipped to do — Bible translation, pioneer church formation, funder cultivation, media evangelism — is a different question, answered by a different, Global.Church-owned vocabulary: the organizational capability scheme via gc:hasOrganizationalCapability. The two axes are orthogonal; see Three classification dimensions below.
Both vocabularies are loaded into the <https://data.global.church/vocabs/> named graph.
The twelve accelerators
| Code | Accelerator | Concept |
|---|---|---|
PRA | Prayer | poe:AccPrayer |
SRA | Scripture/Resource Access | poe:AccScriptureAccess |
VIS | Vision Casting | poe:AccVisionCasting |
MNE | Multi-node Engagement | poe:AccMultiNode |
MOB | Mobilization/Sending | poe:AccMobilization |
COL | Collaborative Engagement | poe:AccCollaboration |
COM | Meeting Needs/Compassion | poe:AccCompassion |
CTX | Critical Contextualization | poe:AccContextualization |
RCI | Research/Cultural Insights | poe:AccResearch |
TRN | Training/Equipping | poe:AccTraining |
MUL | Multiplying Efforts | poe:AccMultiplication |
MKT | Marketplace Involvement | poe:AccMarketplace |
Each concept carries the Toolkit's own definition as skos:definition and its code as skos:notation. The codes are what the API accepts: engagementAccelerators on POST /v0/engagement-claims/submit, accelerators on POST /v0/needs/submit and acceleratorScope on POST /v0/commitments/submit each take one or more of the twelve codes and reject anything else with 400.
A planning aid, not a scorecard. The Toolkit says its accelerators are "for your own strategic planning, not for research, reporting, or outside assessment." In the graph they classify source-attributed activity — what a named organization says it does, in which domain. They are never rolled into a per-people-group scorecard, and no organization is ranked by them. The Toolkit-faithful planning surface is gc:AcceleratorPhaseProfile (below).
Three classification dimensions on an organization
| Dimension | Property | Vocabulary | Question |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | gc:hasOrganizationType | gc:OrganizationTypeScheme (10 structural types) | What is it? |
| Engagement accelerator | gc:hasEngagementAccelerator | poe:EngagementAcceleratorScheme (the Toolkit's 12 domains) | In which Toolkit domains is it active? |
| Organizational capability | gc:hasOrganizationalCapability | gc:OrganizationalCapabilityScheme (19 capabilities, 94 functions) | What is it equipped to do? |
These are independent and compose at query time. IMB, for example, is a Mission Agency active in Mobilization/Sending, Research/Cultural Insights, Training/Equipping and Multiplying Efforts, whose capabilities include Pioneer Church Formation, Cross-Cultural Deployment, Worker Recruitment, People Group Research, Reproducible Discipleship Frameworks and Trainer-of-Trainers Programs. Belief and denomination classifications sit alongside these on the organization.
Every capability concept is also an at:Capability — the faith-market instance of the shared Agentic Trust base's capability concept — so an organization's capabilities are visible to any consumer of that base (agent cards, skills, capability requirements) through at:hasCapability, of which gc:hasOrganizationalCapability is a sub-property.
Property reference: gc:hasEngagementAccelerator
| Detail | Value |
|---|---|
| Type | owl:ObjectProperty |
| Values | The twelve top concepts of poe:EngagementAcceleratorScheme — nothing narrower |
| Multi-valued | Yes |
| Applies to | at:Organization, gc:EngagementAttestation, at:Need |
| Sibling properties | gc:commitmentAcceleratorScope (on at:Commitment), gc:currentEngagementAccelerator (on gc:EngagementStateManifestation), gc:focusAccelerator (on gc:ServiceFocusAssociation) — same values |
On an organization it declares the Toolkit domains the organization is active in. On an attestation it declares the domain(s) of the engagement the organization is reporting for a specific people group. SHACL requires every value to be a skos:topConceptOf poe:EngagementAcceleratorScheme.
Querying
The twelve domains with their codes
Code
Organizations active in Multiplying Efforts
Code
Organizations equipped for a specific function (the capability axis)
Code
Combine the two to ask a coordination question — which organizations active in Multiplying Efforts are equipped for house-church development? — by joining gc:hasEngagementAccelerator poe:AccMultiplication with gc:hasOrganizationalCapability gc:CFnHouseChurchDevelopment.
The Toolkit's diagnostic questions for an accelerator at a phase
gc:AcceleratorPhaseProfile carries the Toolkit's own appendix — for each of the 12 accelerators × 7 phases, the diagnostic questions a team asks itself. It asserts no priority ranking (the Toolkit removed its priority matrix; so did the ontology in v0.45.0).
Code
Provenance
The curated organization seed in <https://data.global.church/orgs/> describes itself: the graph is a void:Dataset attributed to Global.Church with gc:derivationMethod gc:dm-public-web-research ("curated by Global.Church staff from each organization's own public materials; desk research; no organization has confirmed its own record"), and each organization carries prov:hadPrimarySource naming the site read. Treat the classifications above as Global.Church's reading of public materials, not as the organization's own statement, until an organization confirms them.
